Case 8000059/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Serco Caledonian Sleepers Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000059/2023
- Decision date
- 5 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It did so on two grounds: non-compliance with an Order of the Tribunal under rule 37(1)(c), and that the claim, or part struck out, had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
On 15 May 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 29 May 2023 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing.
The result was that the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(c) and rule 37(1)(d) for non-compliance with a Tribunal order and for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.