Case 8000066/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Pender v Not present Rockland Solutions Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000066/2025
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Pender
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing was listed for 24 June 2025 at Glasgow before Employment Judge M Robison. The claimant, Mr D Pender, did not attend. The tribunal recorded that attempts were made to contact him, but he did not answer his mobile and no voicemail could be left.
The reasons note that a previous remote hearing listed for 19 March 2025 did not proceed because the claimant did not attend, although he had emailed that morning saying he had been unwell. The case was postponed and relisted for an in-person hearing, with directions made about lodging documents. The parties were asked to provide available dates by 26 March 2025, but no response was received and a notice of final hearing was sent on 31 March 2025.
No documents were lodged and the tribunal heard nothing further from the claimant. The respondent, Rockland Solutions Ltd, was represented by its managing director, Mr D MacPherson, who said he had heard nothing direct from the claimant since the date of termination of employment.
In light of the claimant's absence and the unsuccessful attempt to enquire into the reasons for it, the tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The judgment does not contain any determination of the substantive wages issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant did not attend the final hearing on 24 June 2025. The tribunal made no findings on the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.