Case 8000086/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8000086/2024 Mr G Smith v Argyll Hospitality Management (and Group) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000086/2024
- Decision date
- 7 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8000086/2024 Mr G Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was listed for a final hearing on 2 and 3 June 2025. The claimant did not attend on 2 June 2025, and no application for a postponement had been received. The Tribunal tried to contact the claimant by telephone, but there was no answer, and the hearing was discharged.
On 5 June 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 19 June 2025, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d). The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying claims beyond that case-management disposal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and does not separately determine the underlying listed causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and does not separately determine the underlying listed causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | This entry reflects the written pay statement category from the case listing; the judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately determine that issue. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.