Case 8000088/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Dunne v River Insolvency — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000088/2024
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Dunne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Glasgow via CVP on 12 April 2024 before Employment Judge J Hendry. It recorded that the claimant, Mr Paul Dunne, was present in person and that the respondent was not present or represented. The judgment states that, for the reasons given orally at the hearing, the tribunal found that the claims were well founded.
The tribunal also allowed the claimant to amend the instance to reflect the respondent's full name as River Insolvency Limited trading as River Insolvency. It then ordered the respondent to pay £422.95 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay and £2,638.84 for accrued but unpaid wages for the period 25 October 2024 until 2 November 2024. The total awarded was £3,061.79.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £422.95 as accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £423 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £2,638.84 as accrued but unpaid wages for the period 25 October 2024 until 2 November 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,639 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,062
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.