Case 8000103/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000103/2022 v Mrs L Menzies John Lewis plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000103/2022
- Decision date
- 2 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000103/2022
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out claim 8000103/2022 under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not comply with the order of 21 December 2022 requiring further particulars of the claim by 18 January 2023. The judgment records that the claimant failed to do so.
The Tribunal then gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 30 January 2023, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge A Jones struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(c). The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying substantive complaint and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive cause of action. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with an order for further particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.