Case 8000104/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Glass v Southesk Settlement — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000104/2026
- Decision date
- 20 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Glass
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because no response had been presented. Employment Judge A Kemp decided to issue judgment on the available material.
The tribunal found that the respondent, Southesk Settlement, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of One Hundred Pounds and Nineteen Pence (£100.19). The judgment was sent to parties on 20 February 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment issued on the available material as no response was presented. Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £100
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.