Case 8000106/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000106/2023 N Cook v Represented by: In Person Alliance Property Holdings Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000106/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000106/2023 N Cook
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 July 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie struck out the claimant's claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated grounds were non-compliance with the Rules of Procedure under rule 37(1)(c) and that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 16 June 2023 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons by 22 June 2023, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive merits determination or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out under Rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(c)
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.