Case 8000107/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Shields v , solicitor Falcon Tower Crane Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000107/2025
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Shields
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Shields worked for Falcon Tower Crane Services Ltd as a crane operator from 10 May 2004 until his summary dismissal on 23 August 2024. The case arose from the collapse of a crane jib at Stead's Place, Edinburgh on 28 November 2023 after events on 27 November 2023. The respondent alleged that he had failed to report damage and had continued to operate the crane after the damage occurred. The tribunal found that senior managers had formed an early view that he was responsible for the damage, and that this view then drove the later investigation and disciplinary process.
Applying section 98(4) ERA 1996 and the Burchell approach, the tribunal held that the dismissal was unfair. It found that Mr Rix and Mr Brown concluded that the claimant knew of the damage and chose to continue operating the crane, but that they did not carry out reasonable investigation before reaching that conclusion. Their theories were not put to the claimant, alternative explanations were not properly explored, and relevant supporting evidence such as site records and other potential witnesses was not pursued. The tribunal also noted that material reports and footage were not properly provided to the claimant during the process, and that the appeal did not operate as a rehearing.
On remedy, the tribunal rejected any reduction for contributory conduct. It found that the claimant had PTSD from the accident, had not worked since dismissal, had not applied for jobs because of his health, and was unlikely to return to work. It therefore made no award for loss of earnings. The respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £18,550 and a compensatory award of £10,665.68, comprising £10,165.68 for notice pay and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The compensatory award was subject to recoupment, with a prescribed element of £10,165.68 for the period 24 August 2024 to 16 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair under s.98(4) ERA 1996 and Burchell. It awarded a basic award and a compensatory award; the compensatory element included notice pay and £500 for loss of statutory rights. No separate wrongful dismissal or breach of contract claim was before the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £29,216 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,216
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £18,550
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £10,666
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell
- band of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.