Case 8000111/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Thomson v Janex Limited (In voluntary liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000111/2026
- Decision date
- 26 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Thomson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim by Janex Limited (in voluntary liquidation). Employment Judge M Whitcombe decided to issue judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages (£1,666.67 gross), had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice (damages of £1,538.48 gross, 4 weeks x £384.62), had dismissed the claimant by reason of redundancy (statutory redundancy payment of £1,730.79, 3 weeks x 1.5 x £384.62) and had failed to pay holiday entitlement on termination (£474.60 gross). The aggregate is £5,410.54 gross; the judgment does not state an explicit total figure.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Unauthorised deduction from wages, gross. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice: 4 weeks x £384.62 = £1,538.48 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Redundancy | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Statutory redundancy payment: 3 weeks x 1.5 x £384.62 = £1,730.79. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Unpaid holiday entitlement upon termination, gross. | Upheld | — | £475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,411
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.