Case 8000126/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000126/2023 Held at Inverness on 25, & March 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Members P Hammond S Larkin Mr Jordan Macdonald v Limited nd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000126/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Inverness
- Panel members
- P Hammond, S Larkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000126/2023 Held at Inverness on 25, & March 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Members P Hammond S Larkin Mr Jordan Macdonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Inverness on 25, 26 and 27 March 2024 before Employment Judge J M Hendry with members P Hammond and S Larkin. For the reasons given orally at the hearing on 27 March 2024, it dismissed the claimant's claims for unfair (constructive) dismissal, whistleblowing, unpaid notice and arrears of pay as not well-founded.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to 'unfair (constructive) dismissal'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Mapped from the judgment's reference to 'unpaid notice'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mapped from the judgment's reference to 'arrears of pay'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.