Case 8000132/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000132/2022 Miss A Mccann Nicole Murray v Represented by: In Person — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000132/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 8000132/2022 Miss A Mccann Nicole Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive cause or causes of action, only that the matter was being dealt with as "the claim".
On 26 January 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 3 February 2023 or to request a hearing to address why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal found that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim on 9 February 2023. No remedy or financial award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records a strike out for failure to actively pursue the claim under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.