Case 8000133/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Haymer v Makar Marketing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000133/2025
- Decision date
- 20 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Haymer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge J Hendry issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,925.00, calculated on the basis of 6 weeks at 37.5 hours per week at £13.00 per hour.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £487.50 gross, calculated on the basis of 37.5 hours at £13.00 per hour. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to six weeks' notice or pay in lieu on dismissal, that £2,112.50 had already been paid in lieu, and that a further £975.00 was due as the balance of the notice payment.
The judgment also directed that the respondent may deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before payment and remit any such sums to HMRC, with written evidence of the deductions and remittance provided to the claimant. The gross sums ordered totalled £4,387.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claimant was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy; award calculated as 6 weeks x 37.5 hours per week x £13.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,925 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; gross award calculated on 37.5 hours x £13.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £488 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant was entitled to six weeks' notice or pay in lieu; £2,112.50 had already been paid in lieu, leaving £975.00 outstanding. | Upheld | — | £975 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,388
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.