Case 8000135/2022 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000135/2022 (A) Held at Aberdeen on April 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss M Ashley v No Appearance Bell & Rose Ltd t/a Whitebridge Hotel — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000135/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hendry
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000135/2022 (A) Held at Aberdeen on April 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss M Ashley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Marieanne Ashley, presented a claim on 6 November 2022. At a preliminary hearing on 16 January 2023, Employment Judge Hendry ordered her to provide a Schedule of Loss and further and better particulars of her discrimination complaints within 21 days. The respondent was represented by a solicitor at that hearing, and the claimant participated.
The claimant did not comply with those orders. The judgment records that, despite a number of reminders, she did not communicate with the Tribunal or the respondent's solicitor. A further preliminary hearing was fixed for 3 April 2023, and by email on 31 March 2023 she was told she needed to attend and provide a satisfactory explanation for the non-compliance, and that a failure to attend could lead to strike out. She was also asked to provide a contact telephone number.
The claimant did not respond, did not provide a telephone number, and did not attend the hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under Rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the basis of non-compliance with Tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claim. The judgment states that this was in accordance with the overriding objective and in the interests of justice. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not itemise the substantive heads of claim; it records that the claimant's claim was struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rules 37(1)(c) and (d)
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.