Case 8000144/2023 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000144/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on August 20235 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr I James v Harbour Energy plc st and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000144/2023
- Decision date
- 9 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000144/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on August 20235 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr I James
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Aberdeen on 3 August 2023, with Employment Judge N M Hosie, and the claimant appeared in person. Harbour Energy Plc and Strategic Resources European Recruitment Consultants Limited were represented.
The judgment records that, for the reasons given orally at the hearing, the unfair dismissal claims against the first and second respondents were dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The extracted text does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons, so no further merits findings can be reliably extracted from this source.
No remedy was awarded in the judgment, and no monetary figure is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction against the first and second respondents; the judgment states the reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.