Case 8000153/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Wood v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000153/2022
- Decision date
- 7 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr G Wood
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Glasgow on 7 August 2022, Employment Judge Brewer recorded that Mr G Wood's claims against ACI Integrated Solutions Limited were struck out pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013. The written record does not set out separate findings on the merits of the individual claims; it records only that the claimant's claims were struck out.
The judgment is dated 7 August 2023 and was entered in the register on 7 September 2023. The record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless either party requested them within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record does not separate the heads of claim; this entry follows the case listing's disability discrimination category. The judgment states that the claimant's claims were struck out under Rule 47. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not separate the heads of claim; this entry follows the case listing's unfair dismissal category. The judgment states that the claimant's claims were struck out under Rule 47. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written record does not separate the heads of claim; this entry follows the case listing's working time category. The judgment states that the claimant's claims were struck out under Rule 47. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.