Case 8000155/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Flynn v Panacea Healthcare Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000155/2025
- Decision date
- 5 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Flynn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment in which no response had been presented, so Employment Judge I McFatridge determined the claim on the available material. The tribunal made no discrimination findings and instead addressed pay, holiday pay, notice pay, and redundancy payment. The respondent, Panacea Healthcare Group Ltd, was ordered to pay all four sums claimed.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and awarded £1,014.40 gross, calculated by reference to £15.85 per hour for 8 hours over 8 days. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £1,775.20 gross, calculated on 112 hours at £15.85 per hour.
On termination, the tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,268.00 gross, described as 2 weeks' pay and calculated on 80 hours at £15.85 per hour. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,902.00, calculated on 3 weeks at 40 hours per week at £15.85 per hour. The judgment also states that the respondent may deduct tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before payment and remit any such deductions to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,014.40, calculated at £15.85 per hour for 8 hours over 8 days. | Upheld | — | £1,014 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,775.20, calculated on 112 hours at £15.85 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,775 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages equivalent to 2 weeks' pay, being £1,268.00 based on 80 hours at £15.85 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,268 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,902.00, calculated on the basis of 3 weeks at 40 hours per week at £15.85 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,902 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,960
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.