Case 8000156/2024 · Employment Tribunal
N Quinn & A Matheson Ms S Shaw v Greater Glasgow Health Board — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000156/2024
- Decision date
- 1 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Members
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- N Quinn, A Matheson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Quinn & A Matheson Ms S Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Band 2 Health Care Support Worker, had been on long-term absence with Long Covid. The respondent accepted she was disabled at the material time and knew of the disability. Occupational health advised in July 2023 that she was not fit to return to her substantive post and that redeployment should be considered, with shorter shifts and a location closer to home.
The claimant relied principally on the delay in issuing a redeployment form after the 25 July 2023 absence meeting, and later argued this was a final straw together with earlier matters. The tribunal accepted that Mr Clark had not deliberately withheld the form. It found his absence through illness, phased return, annual leave, email backlog, and need to prioritise patient care explained the delay, and that he had otherwise sought to support the claimant.
The tribunal found no individual or cumulative breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. It held that the claimant resigned and was not dismissed, so the constructive dismissal complaint was dismissed. The reasonable adjustments complaint was withdrawn after the claimant accepted that completing the redeployment form would not have facilitated a return to work because there were no suitable vacancies at the time or for a six-month period afterward.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed, because there was no repudiatory breach of contract and she resigned. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 was withdrawn at the hearing after the claimant accepted the redeployment form would not have removed the disadvantage because there were no suitable vacancies. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- implied term of trust and confidence
- Courtaulds Northern Textiles Ltd v Andrew
- Malik v BCCI
- Doherty v British Midland Airways Ltd
- Wright v North Ayrshire Council
- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.