Case 8000167/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000167/2022 Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform at Edinburgh on May 2023 Employment Judge: M A Macleod v Norman Hearty David Philp Commercials Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000167/2022
- Decision date
- 12 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Porter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000167/2022 Preliminary Hearing by Cloud Video Platform at Edinburgh on May 2023 Employment Judge: M A Macleod
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented his ET1 on 2 December 2022, saying that he had been unfairly subjected to detriments after making protected disclosures and that he was owed arrears of pay. He later lodged further and better particulars on 22 February 2023 and 13 April 2023 seeking to add disability discrimination claims under sections 13, 15, 19, 20/21, 26 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010, relying on anxiety, depression and borderline personality disorder.
The tribunal held that the proposed additions were a substantial amendment rather than a minor clarification. It noted that the original ET1 did not plead disability discrimination, and that the later particulars introduced new factual allegations, including comments by Mr Hutton, issues about timekeeping, work allocation, and comparators, which had not been pleaded originally.
Applying the amendment authorities and the overriding objective, the tribunal found that the application was out of time, that the claimant knew the facts when he filed the original claim, and that he had not given a good reason for omitting them. It also found that allowing the amendment would require the respondent to carry out significant further investigation and preparation, while the claimant had not produced medical evidence to support his assertion that refusing the amendment would worsen his mental health. The application to amend was refused, and the tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claims at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing on whether the claimant could amend his ET1 to add disability discrimination claims; the tribunal refused the amendment and did not determine the merits of the underlying whistleblowing or wages complaints. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- overriding objective
- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- Office of National Statistics v Ali
- Harvey in Industrial Relations and Employment Law
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.