Case 8000171/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 8000171/2024 & 8000172/2024 (V) Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie v Dr Anil Verma st — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000171/2024
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 8000171/2024 & 8000172/2024 (V) Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDr Anil Verma worked as a locum consultant in emergency medicine at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. Locum People Ltd supplied him for assignment, and he entered into a contract of employment with Edward Thomas Payroll Ltd on 11 January 2023. Payment was made through a chain in which Locum paid ET on receipt of signed timesheets, and ET then paid Dr Verma's limited company, PMCL. After payment problems with ET, Dr Verma began using PayExcel, which charged a 1% service fee.
For the week ending 12 November 2023, Locum received a signed timesheet and paid ET, but ET did not pay Dr Verma's company. The tribunal found that Dr Verma was ET's employee in his personal capacity, that PMCL was only a vehicle for payment, and that liability for the wages rested with ET. It held that ET had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered ET to pay £8,093.95.
The claim against Locum for reimbursement of the PayExcel fee was dismissed. The tribunal accepted that John Green had said he would try to get Locum People to cover outstanding expenses, but held that this did not amount to a legally binding contract to reimburse the fee. The separate claim for expenses was also dismissed because Locum required an authorised expense form signed by a qualified person at ARI, and that form had not been provided, so no legal obligation to make payment had arisen.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against Edward Thomas Payroll Ltd for unpaid wages for the week ending 12 November 2023. The tribunal found Dr Verma had a personal contract of employment with ET, that his limited company was only a payment vehicle, and that ET was liable to pay the wages. | Upheld | — | £8,094 |
| Other | Claim against Locum People Ltd for reimbursement of the 1% PayExcel administration fee (£321.11). The tribunal held that Mr Green's message did not create a legally binding contract to reimburse the fee. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim against Locum People Ltd for expenses totalling £2,795.66 for weeks ending 22/10/23 to 10/12/23. The tribunal found no authorised expense form signed by a qualified person at ARI had been provided, so no legal obligation to pay had arisen. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,094
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.