Case 8000182/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Banerjee v Archangel Seven Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000182/2022
- Decision date
- 2 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Banerjee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 28 September 2023, Employment Judge B Beyzade recorded that the claimant’s complaint that she had been dismissed because she had made a protected disclosure under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 had been withdrawn by the claimant. The tribunal therefore dismissed that complaint under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not contain substantive findings on the merits of that complaint. It states that the remainder of the claimant’s claim would continue, and that a final hearing was listed for 27 November 2023 before an Employment Judge and two members at Glasgow Tribunals Centre. Case management orders were made separately.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Complaint that the claimant was dismissed for the reason or principal reason that she made a protected disclosure under section 103A ERA 1996. The judgment records that this complaint was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.