Case 8000197/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ffolkes Offshore Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000197/2023
- Decision date
- 15 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Mair brought a complaint against Ffolkes Offshore Limited, heard in Aberdeen by CVP on 14 December 2023 before Employment Judge Sangster. The only complaint identified in the judgment was a failure to make reasonable adjustments, which is a disability discrimination complaint.
The tribunal struck out the complaint under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure because it had no reasonable prospects of success. Oral reasons were given at the hearing. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability beyond that strike-out decision.
No monetary award was made. The judgment states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the judgment being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The complaint was a failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal struck it out under Rule 37(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.