Case 8000203/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000203/2024 Held at Aberdeen on June 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry v Interpreter I K Szamfeber Anna Bienkowicz Michael Taylor Roasted (Aberdeen) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000203/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000203/2024 Held at Aberdeen on June 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, represented in person and assisted by an interpreter, brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Michael Taylor Roasted (Aberdeen) Ltd. The respondent did not appear. The hearing was held at Aberdeen before Employment Judge J M Hendry, and the judgment was issued on 26 June 2024.
The tribunal said that, for the reasons given orally at the hearing on 21 June 2024, the claim had not been lodged in time. On that basis, it held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The application was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim had not been lodged in time and that it therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claim under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.