Case 8000208/2024 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000208/2024 (V) Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mrs M I Ayala Gragera v ARRIA Data Text Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000208/2024
- Decision date
- 15 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000208/2024 (V) Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mrs M I Ayala Gragera
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Aberdeen, in a judgment dated 15 May 2024, recorded that the claimant Mrs M I Ayala Gragera succeeded in her claim for unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal said it gave its reasons orally at the hearing on 8 May 2024.
The respondent, Arria Data2Text Limited, was ordered to pay the claimant £26,041.66 in wages. The judgment states that the sum may be paid net of PAYE if appropriate vouching is provided to the claimant to show that PAYE deductions have been made and paid.
No other claim outcome, legal test, or separate head of remedy is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay £26,041.66 in wages. It added that the judgment could be satisfied net of PAYE if appropriate vouching was provided to show PAYE deductions had been made and paid. | Upheld | — | £26,042 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,042
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.