Case 8000210/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Myers v Not present or represented Fonab Castle Hotel Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000210/2025
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Myers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented her ET1 on 24 January 2025, after ACAS early conciliation had run from 26 November 2024 to 2 December 2024. She said she had been employed from 7 July 2024 until 21 September 2024, while the respondent said she had resigned on 12 August 2024 and that 19 August 2024 was the effective date of termination. At the hearing on 24 March 2025 the claimant did not attend and sent an email apologising and saying she had not completed the test or contacted witnesses. The tribunal proceeded in her absence under Rule 47 and accepted that the correct respondent was Fonab Castle Hotel Ltd.
On the papers, the tribunal considered that the only matter potentially within its jurisdiction was a claim for holiday pay. The claimant's references to bullying, loss of possessions, and difficulties with colleagues were not treated as tribunal claims, and she did not link those matters to any protected characteristic. The tribunal also noted that she had less than two years' service and therefore could not bring a claim of unfair constructive dismissal.
The holiday pay claim was held to be out of time. The respondent's final payslip, dated 23 August 2024, showed final pay including holiday pay paid on 30 August 2024. Even if the tribunal accepted the claimant's own later date of 21 September 2024, the claim should have been presented by 20 December 2024. The tribunal said the ACAS stop-the-clock provision would extend time only to 26 December 2024, or at most to 2 January 2025 on the alternative calculation it mentioned, but the ET1 was not submitted until 24 January 2025. The claimant gave no explanation that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, and the tribunal said the claim would in any event be struck out under Rule 38, so it was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal treated holiday pay as the only potentially jurisdictional claim. It found the claim was out of time and said it would in any event be struck out under Rule 38. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 47
- Rule 38
- three-month time limit for holiday pay claims
- ACAS early conciliation stop-the-clock provision
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.