Case 8000218/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Thomas Bottomley v Birra Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000218/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Thomas Bottomley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting in Glasgow by CVP on 10 May 2024, gave oral reasons and later issued its written judgment on 14 May 2024. The claimant, Mr Thomas Bottomley, succeeded in his claim for unlawful deductions from wages against Birra 2 Ltd.
The tribunal ordered the respondent company to pay £1,179.86, described in the judgment as accrued but unpaid wages. No other claim outcome, separate head of loss, or interest award is recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment also records that the respondent may satisfy the judgment by paying the sum due net of tax and national insurance, provided it demonstrates that appropriate deductions were made and the relevant sums were paid to HM Revenue and Customs.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deductions from wages and ordered payment of accrued but unpaid wages in the sum of £1,179.86. The judgment also states that the respondent may satisfy the award by paying the net sum after tax and national insurance deductions if it shows those deductions were made and the relevant sums were paid to HM Revenue and Customs. | Upheld | — | £1,180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,180
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.