Case 8000240/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Elatabani v Represented by:10 Himself GXO Logistics UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000240/2025
- Decision date
- 8 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Elatabani
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D Hoey heard the case in Glasgow on 30 June and 1 to 4 July 2025. The claimant, Mr A Elatabani, appeared himself. The respondent, GXO Logistics UK Limited, was represented by counsel. The tribunal was assisted by an interpreter who interpreted from English to Arabic (Middle Eastern region).
The written judgment is brief. It records that each of the claimant's complaints was ill founded and that the claim was dismissed. On the information in the record, no individual claim was upheld and no monetary remedy was awarded.
The decision was sent to the parties on 8 July 2025. The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment does not set out the individual complaints, but the case listing supplied with the record identifies a race discrimination claim. The tribunal stated that each of the claimant's complaints was ill founded and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The written judgment does not set out the individual complaints, but the case listing supplied with the record identifies a religion or belief discrimination claim. The tribunal stated that each of the claimant's complaints was ill founded and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment does not set out the individual complaints, but the case listing supplied with the record identifies an unlawful deduction from wages claim. The tribunal stated that each of the claimant's complaints was ill founded and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.