Case 8000241/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000241/2024 Mr M Dalziel v MCP Scotland Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000241/2024
- Decision date
- 15 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000241/2024 Mr M Dalziel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the material available, Employment Judge F Eccles found that MCP Scotland Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr M Dalziel's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,672 gross, calculated as 88 hours' pay at £19 per hour.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant expenses in breach of contract. Damages were awarded in the sum of £20.70 net. The hearing listed for 15 May 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,672 gross, described as 88 hours' pay at £19 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,672 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay expenses in breach of contract and ordered damages of £20.70 net. | Upheld | — | £21 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,693
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.