Case 8000242/2025 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, N Hosie Case Number: 8000242/2025 Mr C Weatherly v Teplac holdings Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000242/2025
- Decision date
- 15 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, N Hosie Case Number: 8000242/2025 Mr C Weatherly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge N Hosie struck out Mr C Weatherly's claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued within the meaning of rule 38(1)(d).
The tribunal had written to the claimant on 5 March 2025 asking for further information. No reply was received, so a further letter was sent on 21 March 2025, but there was again no response. A strike-out warning letter then issued on 1 April 2025, giving the claimant until 15 April 2025 to respond or explain why judgment should not be issued.
The claimant did not respond to the warning letter, did not give reasons why judgment should not be made, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim in the extracted text. It records that the claim was struck out under rule 38 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.