Case 8000253/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000253/2024 Mr T Laszlo v Monterey Jacks Perth Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000253/2024
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000253/2024 Mr T Laszlo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented by Monterey Jacks Perth Ltd. On the available material, Employment Judge I McFatridge determined the claim without a hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 16 May 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld the claimant's wages. It ordered payment of £230.77 gross, calculated by reference to 2 days at £115.38 per day.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,846.14, calculated by reference to 16 days at £115.38 per day. The judgment also allowed the respondent to deduct any required income tax and employee National Insurance contributions before payment, provided the deductions were remitted to HMRC and written evidence was supplied to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £230.77, calculated as 2 days at £115.38 per day. | Upheld | — | £231 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,846.14, calculated as 16 days at £115.38 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,846 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,077
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.