Case 8000255/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Iwona Krzemińska v Interpreter Mr Frackowski Buon Giorno Tutti Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000255/2025
- Decision date
- 2 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Iwona Krzemińska
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that Miss Iwona Krzemińska was disabled within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. It found that Buon Giorno Tutti Limited discriminated against her on the grounds of disability contrary to sections 15 and 20 of the Equality Act 2010. The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £15,000 compensation for the disability discrimination claim, plus interest at 8% from 28 November 2024 in the sum of £1,792.40.
The Tribunal also held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. It ordered the respondent to pay a monetary award of £3,125 for unfair dismissal and stated that the recoupment provisions do not apply. The judgment records that summary reasons were given orally and does not provide a further written breakdown of the awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records disability discrimination contrary to sections 15 and 20 of the Equality Act 2010, but does not split the compensation between those statutory bases. | Upheld | Disability | £15,000 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a monetary award for unfair dismissal and states that the recoupment provisions do not apply. | Upheld | — | £3,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,917
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- sections 15 and 20 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.