Case 8000264/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Robins v Animal Concern Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000264/2025
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Robins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim recorded in the judgment was a claim of unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which is the statutory route for a protected-disclosure dismissal claim. The tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits.
The judgment records that the claim was dismissed upon its withdrawal by the Claimant, under rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. No findings of fact, liability reasoning, or remedy assessment are given because the claim did not proceed to a substantive decision.
The hearing was held in Glasgow via CVP on 28 March 2025 before Employment Judge P Smith. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing, subject to any further request in writing within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon its withdrawal by him, under rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.