Case 8000265/2026 · Employment Tribunal
C Aire v Brunton Miller Solicitors — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000265/2026
- Decision date
- 9 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Aire
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Employment Judge L Wiseman issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal upheld the unauthorised deduction from wages claim and ordered Brunton Miller Solicitors to pay C Aire £985.83 gross, recorded as four weeks' wages. It also upheld the holiday entitlement claim and ordered payment of £279.24 gross, recorded as 22.66 hours.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,273.00 gross, calculated as 25 weeks capped at £719. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered notice damages recorded in the extracted text as £2.957.52 net for 12 weeks. No aggregate total award, interest, basic award, compensatory award, or injury to feelings award was separately stated.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders payment of £985.83 gross. | Upheld | — | £986 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and orders payment of £279.24 gross. | Upheld | — | £279 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,273.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,273 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The extracted text records the damages figure as "£2.957.52 net", which appears to denote £2,957.52 net. | Upheld | — | £2,958 |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.