Case 8000273/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Mason v No appearance Heart of Glencoe Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000273/2025
- Decision date
- 3 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Mason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Mason lodged claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract against Heart of Glencoe Ltd. The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn by the claimant because she said she did not have sufficient qualifying service, and the Tribunal's judgment records it as dismissed on that withdrawal.
The Tribunal then required the claimant to provide her contract and identify the alleged contractual breaches. She alleged, in summary, an unreasonable workload, expenses not being paid timeously, excessive hours in May 2024, unsuitable accommodation, no employee handbook, short-notice amendments to holiday pay scales, and health and safety matters not being taken seriously. The claimant did not attend the strike-out hearing and no postponement application was made, so the hearing proceeded in her absence.
The Tribunal held that its jurisdiction over breach of contract claims is governed by section 3 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order SI 1994/1624, and noted that some matters are excluded from jurisdiction, including damages for personal injury and obligations connected with the provision of living accommodation. It found that the claimant had not set out any direct losses arising from the alleged breaches, did not suggest she had not been paid for hours worked or expenses claimed, and identified no recoverable loss in relation to the handbook or other allegations.
The Tribunal concluded that, while the matters complained of might have been relied on in an unfair dismissal claim, they did not amount to free-standing breaches of contract with any prospect of success. The breach of contract claim was therefore struck out under rule 38(1)(a).
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; the reasons record that she said she did not have sufficient qualifying service for the Tribunal to determine the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Struck out under rule 38(1)(a) because the Tribunal found no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant's asserted matters included workload, unpaid expenses, excessive hours in May 2024, unsuitable accommodation, no employee handbook, short-notice changes to holiday pay scales, and health and safety concerns. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38(1)(a) no reasonable prospect of success
- s.3 Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order SI 1994/1624
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.