Case 8000275/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Halley v Lord Carloway — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000275/2025
- Decision date
- 22 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Halley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Halley brought a section 27 Equality Act 2010 victimisation claim against Lord Carloway. He said the respondent victimised him by imposing a Minute of Suspension on 25 July 2019, under section 34(1) of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008, which prevented him from holding the office of part-time Sheriff. The parties agreed facts and written submissions, and the preliminary hearing first addressed whether the claim was time-barred under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal held that the suspension was a single act done on 25 July 2019, not conduct extending over a period. It accepted that the suspension had continuing consequences, but distinguished those consequences from a continuing act. In reaching that view it referred to the authorities cited, including Barclays Bank plc v Kapur, Sougrin, Owusu, Parr and Hendricks, and rejected the claimant's reliance on Somerville and O'Connor as not assisting on the section 123 Equality Act question.
As a result, time ran from 25 July 2019, and the claim presented on 3 February 2025 was outside the statutory time limit. The tribunal therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim. Because that point disposed of the case, it did not determine the remaining preliminary issues on immunity or the application of the Equality Act to the Lord President's powers, and it deferred consideration of the claimant's proposed amendment seeking to add a public interest disclosure claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The tribunal held the complaint was presented outwith the three-month time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010 and that it therefore had no jurisdiction to consider it. It found the Minute of Suspension dated 25 July 2019 was a single discretionary act, not conduct extending over a period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010 time limit
- conduct extending over a period
- continuing act vs continuing consequences
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.