Case 8000296/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000296/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on November 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry J Williams v No Appearance The Works Stores Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000296/2023
- Decision date
- 28 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000296/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on November 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry J Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 21 November 2023, the claimant did not appear. The tribunal gave oral reasons at that hearing and struck out the claims against The Works Stores Limited because they had not been actively pursued.
The written judgment, entered on 28 November 2023, records the strike-out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1. No findings on the merits are recorded and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | Struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1, because the claims had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.