Mr Sandesh Kilaru v House of Arran — 2024

Case reference: 8000297/2024
Decision date: 29 October 2024
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge L Doherty

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Sandesh Kilaru

Respondent

House of Arran

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal, sitting in Edinburgh via CVP before Employment Judge L Doherty, determined the claimant's working time claim under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent did not present a response and no ET3 was lodged. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Sandesh Kilaru the sum due for annual leave accrued but not taken on termination of employment.

Reasons were given orally. The written judgment records the award as £1,1541, which appears on its face to be a typographical error; the amount has been recorded as £11,541 in the extracted case data and is treated here as the tribunal's monetary award. The judgment does not split the award into separate heads beyond the single sum ordered under Regulation 14.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Working time regulations	The extracted judgment text states '£1,1541', which appears to be a typographical error; the amount is recorded as £11,541 based on the case metadata and context.	Upheld	—	£11,541

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £11,541; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.