Case 8000303/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8000303/2025 Miss K Fordham v Mavi Steakhouse — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000303/2025
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8000303/2025 Miss K Fordham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 20 February 2025 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant seeking further information. No reply was received within the time limit set in that letter, and reminder letters were then sent on 14 March 2025 and 3 April 2025. Again, no reply was received from the claimant.
The Tribunal then issued a strike-out warning letter on 1 May 2025, giving the claimant until 15 May 2025 to respond or explain why judgment should not be issued. The claimant did not respond, did not give reasons, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 38 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 1 July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not specify the underlying particulars of the claim; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context provided with the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not specify the underlying particulars of the claim; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing context provided with the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.