Case 8000308/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000308/2024 F Giles v Horizon Photography Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000308/2024
- Decision date
- 16 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000308/2024 F Giles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested, and the Employment Judge issued a judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal found that F Giles was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. The award was calculated at £2,616.18, made up of £436.03 gross weekly pay multiplied by 6.0 weeks.
The hearing listed for 29 May 2024 was cancelled. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Peter O’Donnell on 15 April 2024 and sent to the parties on 16 April 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment calculated at £436.03 gross weekly pay x 6.0 weeks. | Upheld | — | £2,616 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,616
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.