Case 8000318/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000318/2024 Mr J Cameron v First Endeavour LLP (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000318/2024
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000318/2024 Mr J Cameron
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge I McFatridge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal held that First Endeavour LLP had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered it to pay Mr J Cameron the net sum of £2,183.56.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract in respect of unpaid pension contributions. It awarded damages of £1,324.83, described as employer and employee contributions unpaid between September 2023 and December 2023. The hearing listed for 30 May 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,183.56. | Upheld | — | £2,184 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in respect of unpaid pension contributions and awarded damages of £1,324.83 for employer and employee contributions unpaid between September 2023 and December 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,325 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,508
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.