Case 8000325/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Loading page content.
TopCase 8000325/2024 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000325/20245 Held on & December 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mrs L Rudacka
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal against the first respondent, DR Construction Service Ltd, was well-founded. It found that she was unfairly dismissed by that respondent and awarded her £5,171 in total.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint against the first respondent, DR Construction Service Ltd, was well-founded. The complaint against the second respondent was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £5,171 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the other claims were dismissed, but the extracted text does not give further detail on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the other claims were dismissed, but the extracted text does not give further detail on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.