Case 8000371/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Morrison v Campers Scotland Limited (In Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000371/2025
- Decision date
- 29 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Morrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting with Employment Judge M Whitcombe, struck out the claim brought by Mr D Morrison against Campers Scotland Limited (In Liquidation) under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that the claimant had been notified by letter dated 13 March 2025 of the need to obtain the court's consent for the proceedings to be instituted or continued under the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 23 September 2025 asking whether permission had been sought and, if so, with what result. No reply was received, and a reminder sent on 2 October 2025 was also unanswered. The tribunal then gave the claimant an opportunity on 15 October 2025 to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but no response was received by the deadline of 29 October 2025. The claim was therefore struck out for non-prosecution.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records that the claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Insolvency Act 1986
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.