Case 8000380/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000380/2024 Mr B Allward v TDQ Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000380/2024
- Decision date
- 21 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000380/2024 Mr B Allward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. No response had been presented, and the Employment Judge decided the case on the available material. The hearing listed for 14 June 2024 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that TDQ Group Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr B Allward's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,333.32, made up of £1,267.64 gross pay for 115.24 hours worked at £11 per hour and £65.68 in tips.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £422.29, calculated by reference to 38.89 hours' annual leave at £11 per hour gross. The total award therefore came to £1,755.61.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprised £1,267.64 gross pay for 115.24 hours at £11 per hour and £65.68 in tips. | Upheld | — | £1,333 |
| Holiday pay | The award was calculated as 38.89 hours' annual leave at £11 per hour gross. | Upheld | — | £422 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,756
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.