Case 8000389/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Gascoine v Birdp Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000389/2025
- Decision date
- 6 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Gascoine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. The Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, dated 6 June 2025.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the net sum of £1,624.00. It also found that the respondent had failed to comply with the requirement to make payment of tips and awarded £20.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,624.00 net. | Upheld | — | £1,624 |
| Other | The judgment records a separate failure to comply with the requirement to make payment of tips and awards £20.00. | Upheld | — | £20 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,644
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.