Case 8000411/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Member N Elliott Tribunal Member J Haria Mr Paul Ainsworth v West Dunbartonshire Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000411/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Tribunal
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- N Elliott, J Haria
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member N Elliott Tribunal Member J Haria Mr Paul Ainsworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent local authority as Supported Accommodation Team Leader and had been absent on sick leave since 29 March 2023. The respondent conceded that he was disabled from May 2022 by reason of anxiety, depression, insomnia and PTSD, and knowledge of disability was also conceded during the hearing.
The Tribunal found that the claimant established both alleged PCPs: that Team Leaders like him would have to do the work of absent Team Leaders, and that work was unequally distributed among Team Leaders following absences or departures. It also found that those PCPs placed him at a substantial disadvantage compared with non-disabled persons, because his disability made him more vulnerable to stress, anxiety, ill health and absence arising from a significantly increased workload.
The Tribunal held that the duty to make reasonable adjustments arose, but that the respondent discharged it. It found that additional support from Sarah Weed and Brian Kerr, the progressive increase in Sarah Weed's responsibilities, and the transfer of some responsibilities to Joanne Sutherland formed a reasonable package of adjustments. It accepted that other Team Leaders lacked longer-term capacity to absorb further duties, and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim was disability discrimination by failure to make reasonable adjustments. Liability only was listed, with remedy to be considered only if the claimant succeeded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
17 references- s.6 EqA 2010
- s.20(3) EqA 2010
- s.21 EqA 2010
- s.212(1) EqA 2010
- Environment Agency v Rowan
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Higgins
- Ishola v Transport for London
- Harrod v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police
- Smith v Churchills Stairlifts plc
- Archibald v Fife Council
- Cordell v FCO
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Fowler
- Griffiths v SSWP
- Project Management Institute v Latif
- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- Abercrombie v Aga Rangemaster Ltd
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.