Case 8000414/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Mackay v Logan Energy Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000414/2025
- Decision date
- 5 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beyzade
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Mackay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sitting at Edinburgh before Employment Judge Beyzade dismissed all three complaints brought by Mr K Mackay against Logan Energy Ltd. The complaints were framed as unfair dismissal contrary to section 100(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and direct disability discrimination contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. Each claim was recorded as not well founded and dismissed.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons, and it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No compensatory, basic award, or discrimination remedy was awarded, and no injury to feelings or interest figures are recorded. The judgment therefore records a complete dismissal of the claims without any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint under section 100(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination complaint under section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.