Case 8000419/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Mr V Horga v Kinchie Renewable Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000419/2026
- Decision date
- 16 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Neilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr V Horga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Mr V Horga was employed by Kinchie Renewable Limited from 1 March 2015 until 1 February 2026, when his employment was terminated without notice on the grounds of redundancy. It ordered the respondent to pay a statutory redundancy payment of £7,165.40.
The Tribunal found that the respondent made unlawful deductions from Mr Horga’s wages in respect of notice pay and ordered payment of £5,307.70 for 10 weeks of statutory notice. It also found that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to remit employer pension contributions and awarded £5,000 in compensation.
Mr Horga’s remaining claims concerning non-payment of tax and National Insurance were dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with them. The amounts ordered total £17,473.10. Oral reasons were provided at the hearing; the judgment records no written reasons beyond those set out in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,165 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded in respect of 10 weeks of statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £5,308 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent failed to remit employer pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
| Other | Claims concerning non-payment of tax and National Insurance were dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to deal with them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,473
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.