Case 8000422/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Lisa Mullen v The City of Edinburgh Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000422/2025
- Decision date
- 29 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Lisa Mullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered whether it had jurisdiction to hear a disability discrimination claim presented on 19 February 2025, after the three-month period from the alleged acts of discrimination connected with the claimant's employment ending on 30 June 2024. The respondent did not contest time bar and asked the Tribunal to decide the issue on the claimant's evidence from the preliminary hearing.
The Tribunal accepted the claimant's uncontested evidence that, until around 10 February 2025, she had been advised by employees of the respondent, including employees connected to Human Resources, that she needed to know the outcome of her grievance before presenting a claim. The grievance outcome was given on 17 February 2025, and the respondent was aware during this period that the claimant had contacted ACAS and intended to bring a claim.
The Tribunal concluded that it was just and equitable under section 123(1)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 to extend time to 19 February 2025. It found that the prejudice to the respondent was limited and would not materially affect its ability to defend the claim, while refusing an extension would deny the claimant the opportunity to bring the claim. The Tribunal therefore held that it had jurisdiction to consider the disability discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment determined only the preliminary issue of time bar and jurisdiction. The substantive disability discrimination claim remains defended and was not adjudicated on its merits. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.