Case 8000423/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8000423/2024 Mr G MacLanachan v First Endeavour LLP (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 8000423/2024
- Decision date
- 19 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8000423/2024 Mr G MacLanachan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr G MacLanachan's claim against First Endeavour LLP (In Compulsory Liquidation) under rules 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-compliance with a Tribunal order and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal had advised the claimant on 30 May 2024 that the court's consent was required to proceed and later sent several reminders. On 2 April 2026, the claimant said that he had received payment for loss of earnings. He did not respond when subsequently asked whether he wished to withdraw the claim, nor did he respond to the strike-out warning by 5 May 2026, provide reasons against strike-out, or request a hearing. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not distinguish the listed breach of contract head separately. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not distinguish the listed unlawful deduction from wages head separately. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.