Case 8000428/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000428/2024 Mr A Gay v ARB Wind Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000428/2024
- Decision date
- 24 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000428/2024 Mr A Gay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in which the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. Employment Judge A Jones determined the case on the available material and issued judgment without a hearing on the merits. The hearing listed for 21 June 2024 was cancelled.
The tribunal held that ARB Wind Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £635.33 in respect of wages for the period ending 31 January 2024. It also held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £639.93, calculated as 2.33 days at £274.65 per day.
The judgment also authorised the respondent to deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before payment, provided it remitted those sums to HMRC and gave the claimant written evidence of the deductions and remittance. No separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or any other remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £635.33 for the period ending 31 January 2024. | Upheld | — | £635 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £639.93, calculated as 2.33 days at £274.65 per day. | Upheld | — | £640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,275
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.