Case 8000438/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000438/2023 B Booth, Legal Officer Mrs J McPherson v The Ayrshire Hospice — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000438/2023
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Booth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000438/2023 B Booth, Legal Officer Mrs J McPherson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim identified in the judgment was a Public Interest Disclosure claim. The tribunal record states that the claimant withdrew that claim, and it was then dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The decision was issued by a Legal Officer rather than an Employment Judge. The judgment explains that the claimant could apply for the decision to be considered afresh by an Employment Judge within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no substantive findings on liability beyond the withdrawal and dismissal are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the Public Interest Disclosure claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.